Comparison geneticist virologist vs SEM Scannining Electron Microscope & XRAY

DNS - Analyzer (Electrophoresis)



  • 20-30% error rate



  • Excel-like data sheets with genome
    Breakdown



    Source: //doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088519.g002

  • only in the result of the genome change = success recognizable -
    by e.g. Muscle growth



  • Danger of false statements with new objects in the
    atomic space



  • No official control system available


3D Dataset Electron Microscopy



  • Error rate ?%?



  • wrong description of the 3D object



  • re-evaluation of the scanned 3D object



  • new functions recognizable (especially if objects could move - but are currently set in cryostasis)



  • Review of current science (confirm
    chemical-physical processes?)



  • interaction of different objects with each other
    Cell level down to the subatomic level




  • Confirm / refute various viruses / objects


  • this is what a virus should look like (an internal RNS in RED is visible):


    Source: //doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088288.g006


  • The "viruses" of the 3D objects shown here on Federation.com, however, are hollow in the center:

    Rota-Virus
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *